Opinions of the United 2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-21-2006 Santiago v. York Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 05-4729 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006 Recommended Citation "Santiago v. York" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 45. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/45 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT __________ No. 05-4729 __________ ANIBAL SANTIAGO Appellant, vs. YORK CITY, PENNSYLVANIA; THE HONORABLE JOHN BRENNER, Mayor and Agent of the York City, Pa.; CHARLES H. ROBERTSON, Former Mayor and Agent of the York City, Pa.; THE YORK CITY POLICE DEPT., A police department organized and existing in York City, Pa.; HERBERT F. GROSFSCSIK, Former Police Commissioner and Agent of Defendants York City, Pa. and York City Police Department; POLICE CHIEF MICHAEL HILL, Chief of Police and Agent for Defendants York City, Pa. and York City Police Department, Appellees. __________ On Appeal from the United States District Court For the Middle District of Pennsylvania (No. 02-cv-1217) District Judge: Honorable Yvette Kane __________ Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a) November 28, 2006 ___________ Before: FUENTES and GARTH, Circuit Judges, and POLLAK, District Judge 1 (Opinion Filed: December 21, 2006) 1 The Honorable Louis H. Pollak, Senior District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.  OPINION Per Curiam: Substantially for the reasons set forth in District Judge Kane’s Memorandum and Order of September 26, 2005, this Court will affirm the District Court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendant York City.