In Re: Jorge Porte, 06-1059 (2006)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Number: 06-1059
Visitors: 60
Filed: Mar. 24, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-24-2006 In Re: Jorge Porte Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 06-1059 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006 Recommended Citation "In Re: Jorge Porte " (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 1388. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/1388 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the
Summary: Opinions of the United 2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-24-2006 In Re: Jorge Porte Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 06-1059 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006 Recommended Citation "In Re: Jorge Porte " (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 1388. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/1388 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the U..
More
Opinions of the United
2006 Decisions States Court of Appeals
for the Third Circuit
3-24-2006
In Re: Jorge Porte
Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential
Docket No. 06-1059
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006
Recommended Citation
"In Re: Jorge Porte " (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 1388.
http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/1388
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.
BPS-160 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
________________
No. 06-1059
________________
IN RE: JORGE PORTE,
Petitioner
________________
On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the
United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
(Related to M.D. Pa. No. 04-cv-01534)
________________
Submitted Under Rule 21, Fed. R. App. Pro.
March 16, 2006
BEFORE: RENDELL, AMBRO and BECKER, Circuit Judges
(Filed: March 24, 2006)
________________
OPINION
________________
PER CURIAM
In July 2004 Jorge Porte filed a habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง
2241. In December 2005 Porte filed a mandamus petition seeking an order compelling
the District Court to rule on his petition. Shortly thereafter the District Court did so,
denying the petition on January 9, 2006.
Accordingly, the mandamus petition is moot, and we will deny it.
Source: CourtListener