Filed: Sep. 27, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-27-2007 In Re: Williams Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 07-3103 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007 Recommended Citation "In Re: Williams " (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 365. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/365 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United S
Summary: Opinions of the United 2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-27-2007 In Re: Williams Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 07-3103 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007 Recommended Citation "In Re: Williams " (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 365. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/365 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United St..
More
Opinions of the United
2007 Decisions States Court of Appeals
for the Third Circuit
9-27-2007
In Re: Williams
Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential
Docket No. 07-3103
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007
Recommended Citation
"In Re: Williams " (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 365.
http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/365
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2007 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova
University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.
AMENDED HLD-148 (August 2007) NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
NO. 07-3103
________________
IN RE: DWIGHT WILLIAMS,
Petitioner
____________________________________
On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the
United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(Related to E.D. Pa. Crim. No. 05-cr-00576)
_____________________________________
Submitted Under Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
August 24, 2007
Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, WEIS and GARTH, Circuit Judges
(Filed September 27, 2007)
_______________________
OPINION
_______________________
PER CURIAM.
It appears that Dwight Williams was arrested in September 2005, and since
that time has been detained while awaiting trial on drug charges. Williams claims that on
May 15, 2007, he filed a pro se motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3162, seeking to challenge
the legality of his incarceration. Williams seeks a writ of mandamus directing the District
Court to rule on the motion. Importantly, however, the District Court docket contains no
1
entry of a pro se filing by Williams in May 2007. We cannot, of course, direct
adjudication of a motion which has not been filed. Accordingly, we will deny the
mandamus petition.1
1
We also deny Williams’ motion for appointment of counsel. To the extent
that Williams seeks information about court-appointed representation in his criminal
proceedings, his inquiries should be directed to the District Court.
2