Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Garcia v. Atty Gen USA, 07-2164 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 07-2164 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jan. 14, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Opinions of the United 2009 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-14-2009 Garcia v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 07-2164 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009 Recommended Citation "Garcia v. Atty Gen USA" (2009). 2009 Decisions. Paper 1960. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009/1960 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of t
More
Opinions of the United 2009 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-14-2009 Garcia v. Atty Gen USA Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 07-2164 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009 Recommended Citation "Garcia v. Atty Gen USA" (2009). 2009 Decisions. Paper 1960. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009/1960 This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2009 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 07-2164 ROSALBA ROA GARCIA, Petitioner v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Respondent ____________ ON PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS (BIA No. A74-872-805) ____________ ORDER On October 28, 2008, the Court issued an opinion in the above entitled petition for review. Judge Fuentes had submitted a dissenting opinion for filing but due to an error in processing, the dissenting opinion was not filed with the majority opinion. Accordingly, at the direction of the Court the opinion and judgment filed on October 28, 2008 are hereby vacated. The Clerk shall docket the revised opinion and judgment. It is noted that the Respondent has filed a petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. Within 10 days from entry of the revised opinion and judgment, the Respondent may file a supplement to the petition for rehearing or inform the Clerk in writing that supplementation is not required and that Respondent shall rely on the petition for rehearing as originally submitted. Action by the Court on the petition for rehearing is deferred pending a response by the Respondent in accordance with this order. For the Court, Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk Dated: January 14, 2009
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer