Filed: Nov. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 11-1398 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. QUINTRELL REYNOS, Appellant (E.D. Pa. No. 09-cr-00618-002) Present: McKEE, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, SCIRICA, RENDELL, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENWAY, Jr., and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges ORDER Upon further consideration and argument, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that en banc consideration was improvidently granted. Accordingly, the opinion and judgment entered May 22, 2012 for
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 11-1398 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. QUINTRELL REYNOS, Appellant (E.D. Pa. No. 09-cr-00618-002) Present: McKEE, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, SCIRICA, RENDELL, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENWAY, Jr., and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges ORDER Upon further consideration and argument, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that en banc consideration was improvidently granted. Accordingly, the opinion and judgment entered May 22, 2012 for ..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 11-1398 _____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. QUINTRELL REYNOS, Appellant (E.D. Pa. No. 09-cr-00618-002) Present: McKEE, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, SCIRICA, RENDELL, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENWAY, Jr., and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges ORDER Upon further consideration and argument, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that en banc consideration was improvidently granted. Accordingly, the opinion and judgment entered May 22, 2012 for the above captioned case are hereby reinstated. By the Court, /s/ Theodore A. McKee Chief Judge Dated: November 21, 2012 trg/cc: Joseph T. Labrum, III, Esq. Robert A. Zauzmer, Esq. Megan S. Scheib, Esq.
