Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Harry Katzin, 12-2548 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 12-2548 Visitors: 46
Filed: Dec. 12, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 12-2548 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant v. HARRY KATZIN; MICHAEL KATZIN; MARK LOUIS KATZIN, SR. PRESENT: McKEE, Chief Judge, RENDELL, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR., VANASKIE, SHWARTZ and VAN ANTWERPEN1 Circuit Judges ORDER A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en banc in the above captioned case, it is ordered that the petition for en banc rehearing is GRANTED. The Cl
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 12-2548 _____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant v. HARRY KATZIN; MICHAEL KATZIN; MARK LOUIS KATZIN, SR. PRESENT: McKEE, Chief Judge, RENDELL, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR., VANASKIE, SHWARTZ and VAN ANTWERPEN1 Circuit Judges ORDER A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en banc in the above captioned case, it is ordered that the petition for en banc rehearing is GRANTED. The Clerk of this Court shall list the case for rehearing en banc May 28, 2014. The opinion and judgment entered October 22, 2013 are hereby vacated. By the Court, /s/ Theodore A. McKee Chief Circuit Judge Dated: December 12, 2013 ARL/cc: EM; TMZ; RAZ; TAD; WAD; RCC; CNC; NW; BEW; SJR; WJW; HMF; MH; PG 1 Will participate as a member of the en banc court pursuant to 3d. Cir. I.O.P. 9.6.4.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer