Filed: Apr. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Amended HLD-005 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 15-1112 _ IN RE: STEVEN MENSAH-YAWSON, Petitioner _ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (Related to W.D. Pa. Crim. No. 2-09-cr-00276-001) _ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. March 19, 2015 Before: MCKEE, Chief Judge, GARTH and BARRY, Circuit Judges (Filed: April 20, 2015) _ OPINION* _ PER CURIAM Before us is Steven
Summary: Amended HLD-005 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 15-1112 _ IN RE: STEVEN MENSAH-YAWSON, Petitioner _ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (Related to W.D. Pa. Crim. No. 2-09-cr-00276-001) _ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. March 19, 2015 Before: MCKEE, Chief Judge, GARTH and BARRY, Circuit Judges (Filed: April 20, 2015) _ OPINION* _ PER CURIAM Before us is Steven M..
More
Amended HLD-005 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 15-1112
___________
IN RE: STEVEN MENSAH-YAWSON,
Petitioner
____________________________________
On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the
United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
(Related to W.D. Pa. Crim. No. 2-09-cr-00276-001)
____________________________________
Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
March 19, 2015
Before: MCKEE, Chief Judge, GARTH and BARRY, Circuit Judges
(Filed: April 20, 2015)
___________
OPINION*
___________
PER CURIAM
Before us is Steven Mensah-Yawson’s petition for a writ of mandamus, in which
he requests an order directing the District Court to rule on his petition for a writ of error
coram nobis. The District Court ruled on and denied that petition on April 2, 2015.
*
This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not
constitute binding precedent.
Thus, Mensah-Yawson’s mandamus petition is moot and we will dismiss it on that basis.
See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp.,
77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996).
2