Filed: Oct. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: BLD-016 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 15-3416 _ IN RE: RAFAEL VASQUEZ, Petitioner _ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Related to D.N.J. Civ. No. 1:14-cv-05297) _ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. October 16, 2015 Before: FUENTES, KRAUSE and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed October 21, 2015) _ OPINION* _ PER CURIAM Pro se petitioner Rafael Vasquez, a federal pris
Summary: BLD-016 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 15-3416 _ IN RE: RAFAEL VASQUEZ, Petitioner _ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Related to D.N.J. Civ. No. 1:14-cv-05297) _ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P. October 16, 2015 Before: FUENTES, KRAUSE and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed October 21, 2015) _ OPINION* _ PER CURIAM Pro se petitioner Rafael Vasquez, a federal priso..
More
BLD-016 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 15-3416
___________
IN RE: RAFAEL VASQUEZ,
Petitioner
____________________________________
On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
(Related to D.N.J. Civ. No. 1:14-cv-05297)
____________________________________
Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
October 16, 2015
Before: FUENTES, KRAUSE and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed October 21, 2015)
_________
OPINION*
_________
PER CURIAM
Pro se petitioner Rafael Vasquez, a federal prisoner, filed a petition for a writ of
mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651, seeking an order directing the United States
District Court for the District of New Jersey to order the government to respond to
Vasquez’s motion to vacate his sentence filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On October
*
This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not
constitute binding precedent.
13, 2015, the government filed its answer to Vasquez’s motion. Because Vasquez has
now received the relief he sought, we will dismiss the petition as moot.
2