Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Richard Fields v. City of Philadelphia, 16-1650 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Number: 16-1650 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 13, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 16-1650 _ RICHARD FIELDS, Appellant v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; SISCA, POLICE OFFICER, BADGE NO. 9547; JOE DOE, AN UNKNOWN PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER _ No. 16-1651 _ AMANDA GERACI, Appellant v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; DAWN BROWN, POLICE OFFICER, BADGE NO. 2454; TERRA M. BARROW, POLICE OFFICER, BADGE NO. 1147; NIKKI L. JONES, POLICE OFFICER, BADGE NO. 2549; RHONDA SMITH, POLICE OFFICER, BADGE NO. 1373 _ Appeal from the United Sta
More
                                                PRECEDENTIAL

 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
      FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
         ________________

               No. 16-1650
            ________________

            RICHARD FIELDS,
                      Appellant

                     v.

    CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; SISCA,
  POLICE OFFICER, BADGE NO. 9547;
JOE DOE, AN UNKNOWN PHILADELPHIA
          POLICE OFFICER
          ________________

               No. 16-1651
            ________________

            AMANDA GERACI,
                    Appellant

                    v.

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; DAWN BROWN,
   POLICE OFFICER, BADGE NO. 2454;
 TERRA M. BARROW, POLICE OFFICER,
    BADGE NO. 1147; NIKKI L. JONES,
   POLICE OFFICER, BADGE NO. 2549;
   RHONDA SMITH, POLICE OFFICER,
           BADGE NO. 1373
           ________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court
   for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. Civil Action Nos. 2-14-cv-04424/05264)
 District Judge: Honorable Mark A. Kearney
             ________________
Before: AMBRO, RESTREPO, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges


                           ORDER AMENDING OPINION

The Court has been made aware of a typographical error in the opinion entered on July 7,
2017. Accordingly, it is O R D E R E D that sentence on page 19, paragraph 1, line 11 of
the opinion should read:

            Notably, the plaintiff in Fordyce [v. City of Seattle, 
55 F.3d 436
(9th Cir.
      1995)] claimed he was recording a public protest for a local news station.”); …




For the Court,


Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk
Date: July 13, 2017

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer