Wilfredo Quinones-Velazquez v. James Maroulis, 16-2697 (2017)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Number: 16-2697
Visitors: 27
Filed: Feb. 08, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 16-2697 _ WILFREDO QUINONES-VELAZQUEZ; ELIZABETH MADRID HENAO, Appellants v. JAMES PETER MAROULIS _ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 1-15-cv-01678) District Judge: Honorable Christopher C. Conner _ _ ORDER AMENDING OPINION _ It has come to the Court’s attention that a typographical error appears in the opinion which was filed on February 3, 201
Summary: NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _ No. 16-2697 _ WILFREDO QUINONES-VELAZQUEZ; ELIZABETH MADRID HENAO, Appellants v. JAMES PETER MAROULIS _ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 1-15-cv-01678) District Judge: Honorable Christopher C. Conner _ _ ORDER AMENDING OPINION _ It has come to the Court’s attention that a typographical error appears in the opinion which was filed on February 3, 2017..
More
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 16-2697
___________
WILFREDO QUINONES-VELAZQUEZ;
ELIZABETH MADRID HENAO,
Appellants
v.
JAMES PETER MAROULIS
____________________________________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. Civil Action No. 1-15-cv-01678)
District Judge: Honorable Christopher C. Conner
____________________________________
___________
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
___________
It has come to the Court’s attention that a typographical error appears in the
opinion which was filed on February 3, 2017 with respect to the quote appearing on page
3 of the opinion in the first sentence of subsection II. As such, the opinion is amended as
follows:
A plaintiff’s burden of satisfying the amount in controversy required for diversity
jurisdiction “is not especially onerous.” Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Steven & Ricci
Inc.,
835 F.3d 388, 395 (3d Cir. 2016).
As the error is typographical in nature, the original filing date of the opinion and
judgment will not be altered.
For the Court,
Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk
Dated: February 8, 2017
JK/cc: Wilfredo Quinones-Velazquez
Elizabeth Madrid Henao
Jeffrey G. Velander, Esq.
2
Source: CourtListener