Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Maurice N. Whittington v. Paul F. Pegelow, Superintendent, 7962_1 (1959)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 7962_1 Visitors: 15
Filed: Nov. 04, 1959
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 271 F.2d 416 Maurice N. WHITTINGTON, Appellant, v. Paul F. PEGELOW, Superintendent, et al., Appellees. No. 7962. United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit. Argued Nov. 3, 1959. Decided Nov. 4, 1959. Charles Cahn, II, Baltimore, Md. (Court-appointed counsel) for appellant. Maurice N. Whittington, pro se, on brief. A. Andrew Giangreco, Asst. U.S. Atty., Alexandria, Va., for appellees. Before HAYNSWORTH and BOREMAN, Circuit Judges, and R. DORSEY WATKINS, District Judge. PER CURIAM. 1 Petitioner
More

271 F.2d 416

Maurice N. WHITTINGTON, Appellant,
v.
Paul F. PEGELOW, Superintendent, et al., Appellees.

No. 7962.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued Nov. 3, 1959.
Decided Nov. 4, 1959.

Charles Cahn, II, Baltimore, Md. (Court-appointed counsel) for appellant.

Maurice N. Whittington, pro se, on brief.

A. Andrew Giangreco, Asst. U.S. Atty., Alexandria, Va., for appellees.

Before HAYNSWORTH and BOREMAN, Circuit Judges, and R. DORSEY WATKINS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

Petitioner, in his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, does not ask for release from detention, does not allege that his detention is illegal, and we find nothing in the petition justifying any relief. The action of the district court in dismissing the petition is therefore affirmed.

2

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer