Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. David Von Miller, 9526 (1964)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 9526 Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 20, 1964
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 339 F.2d 445 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. David VON MILLER, Appellant. No. 9526. United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit. Argued Nov. 19, 1964. Decided Nov. 20, 1964. John C. Riggs, High Point, N.C. (John Haworth and Haworth, Riggs, Kuhn & Haworth, High Point, N.C., on brief), for appellant. William H. Murdock, U.S. Atty. (R. Bruce White, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., on brief), for appellee. Before BRYAN and BELL, Circuit Judges, and NORTHROP, District Judge. PER CURIAM. 1 The record i
More

339 F.2d 445

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
David VON MILLER, Appellant.

No. 9526.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued Nov. 19, 1964.
Decided Nov. 20, 1964.

John C. Riggs, High Point, N.C. (John Haworth and Haworth, Riggs, Kuhn & Haworth, High Point, N.C., on brief), for appellant.

William H. Murdock, U.S. Atty. (R. Bruce White, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.

Before BRYAN and BELL, Circuit Judges, and NORTHROP, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

The record in this case discloses that the evidence was sufficient to warrant the verdict, and our attention is directed to no error of law at trial. We affirm the judgment of the District Court.

2

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer