Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Eugenia B. MacLoskie as of the Estate of Charles W. MacLoskie Deceased, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Royal Indemnity Company, 10901_1 (1967)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 10901_1 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 10, 1967
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 374 F.2d 892 Eugenia B. MACLOSKIE, as Executrix of the Estate of Charles W. Macloskie, Deceased, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellees, v. ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant. No. 10901. United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit. Argued March 7, 1967. Decided March 10, 1967. G. Dana Sinkler, Charleston, S.C. (Charles H. Gibbs, and Sinkler, Gibbs & Simons, Charleston, S.C., on brief), for appellant. J. W. Cabaniss, Charleston, S.C. (deRossett Myers, Ben Scott Whaley and
More

374 F.2d 892

Eugenia B. MACLOSKIE, as Executrix of the Estate of Charles
W. Macloskie, Deceased, and State Farm Mutual
Automobile Insurance Company, Appellees,
v.
ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant.

No. 10901.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued March 7, 1967.
Decided March 10, 1967.

G. Dana Sinkler, Charleston, S.C. (Charles H. Gibbs, and Sinkler, Gibbs & Simons, Charleston, S.C., on brief), for appellant.

J. W. Cabaniss, Charleston, S.C. (deRossett Myers, Ben Scott Whaley and Nathaniel L. Barnwell, and Pritchard, Myers & Morrison, Grimball & Cabaniss, and Barnwell, Whaley, Stevenson & Patterson, Charleston, S.C., on brief), for appellees.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BRYAN and J. SPENCER BELL, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

For the reason stated by the District Court, the judgment is affirmed.

2

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer