Filed: Mar. 13, 1967
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 370 F.2d 570 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Richard Hayes HINTON, Appellant. No. 10586. United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit. Argued Dec. 8, 1966. Decided Jan. 6, 1967, Certiorari Denied March 13, 1967, See 87 S. Ct. 1031 . Edwin M. Young, Richmond, Va., and Vernon F. Daughtridge, Wilson, N.C., for appellant. Charles S. Porter, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty. (Terrell L. Glenn, U.S. Atty., on brief), for appellee. Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER and CHAVEN, Circuit Judges. PER
Summary: 370 F.2d 570 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Richard Hayes HINTON, Appellant. No. 10586. United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit. Argued Dec. 8, 1966. Decided Jan. 6, 1967, Certiorari Denied March 13, 1967, See 87 S. Ct. 1031 . Edwin M. Young, Richmond, Va., and Vernon F. Daughtridge, Wilson, N.C., for appellant. Charles S. Porter, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty. (Terrell L. Glenn, U.S. Atty., on brief), for appellee. Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER and CHAVEN, Circuit Judges. PER C..
More
370 F.2d 570
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Richard Hayes HINTON, Appellant.
No. 10586.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued Dec. 8, 1966.
Decided Jan. 6, 1967, Certiorari Denied March 13, 1967, See
87 S. Ct. 1031.
Edwin M. Young, Richmond, Va., and Vernon F. Daughtridge, Wilson, N.C., for appellant.
Charles S. Porter, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty. (Terrell L. Glenn, U.S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER and CHAVEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
This appeal presents the identical question considered by the Court in United States v. Worley, 4 Cir., 368 F.2d 625 (decided November 3, 1966.) We affirm for the reasons stated by us in Worley.
