Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

12031_1 (1968)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12031_1 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 21, 1968
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 398 F.2d 826 Nellie WOODS, widow of John R. Woods, Deceased, Appellant, v. Cletus B. HANLEY, as State Compensation Commissioner, Sidney J. Kwass, as Chairman, George W. Stokes and Richard E. Davis, as members of the West Virginia Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, and Boone County Coal Corporation, a corporation, Appellees. No. 12031. United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit. Argued June 19, 1968. Decided June 21, 1968. Franklin W. Kern, Charleston, W. Va., for appellant. Edward I. Eiland
More

398 F.2d 826

Nellie WOODS, widow of John R. Woods, Deceased, Appellant,
v.
Cletus B. HANLEY, as State Compensation Commissioner, Sidney
J. Kwass, as Chairman, George W. Stokes and Richard E.
Davis, as members of the West Virginia Workmen's
Compensation Appeal Board, and Boone County Coal
Corporation, a corporation, Appellees.

No. 12031.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued June 19, 1968.
Decided June 21, 1968.

Franklin W. Kern, Charleston, W. Va., for appellant.

Edward I. Eiland, Logan, W.Va. (Estep, Smith & Eiland, Logan, W. Va., on the brief), for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and SOBELOFF and BOREMAN, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

In light of the factual suggestions made in the course of this litigation, the case presents an issue of the deprivation of equal protection and due process in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment arising from the West Virginia Code, 23-4-6a(d) (1966), the silicosis provisions of that State's Workmen's Compensation Act. This is made to appear from a now undisputed history of the processing of seemingly identical claims with wholly irreconcilable results. The circumstances call for the resolution of the issue by a three-judge district court. The court may on application afford the parties an opportunity for further development of the record.

2

The order of dismissal is vacated and the case remanded with directions to the District Judge to take appropriate steps for the convening of a three-judge district court.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer