Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Prince Lithograph Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 12551_1 (1968)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12551_1 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 26, 1968
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 405 F.2d 175 70 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2048 PRINCE LITHOGRAPH CO., Inc., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 12551. United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit. Dec. 26, 1968. E. Riley Casey, Washington, D.C., and Francis T. Coleman, Washington, D.C. on brief, for petitioner. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William Wachter and Edith Nash, Attys., N.L.R.B., on brief, for respondent. Before BRYAN,
More

405 F.2d 175

70 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2048

PRINCE LITHOGRAPH CO., Inc., Petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

No. 12551.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Dec. 26, 1968.

E. Riley Casey, Washington, D.C., and Francis T. Coleman, Washington, D.C. on brief, for petitioner.

Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William Wachter and Edith Nash, Attys., N.L.R.B., on brief, for respondent.

Before BRYAN, CRAVEN and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

On reciprocal petitions, Prince Lithograph Co., Inc. prays dissolution, and the National Labor Relations Board enforcement, of its order declaring Prince a violator of Section 8(a)(3) and (1) of the Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. 151 et seq., 158(a)(3) and (1). The finding, 171 NLRB No. 150 (June 6, 1968), was that the company in September 1967 at its plant in Fairfax County, Virginia, had discontinued part-time employment and withdrawn a tender of full-time employment of a lithographer because of his union participation.

2

Review of the record does not disclose an absence of substantial evidence permitting the Board's determinations and curative directions. They may not, then, be disturbed. NLRB v. Lester Bros., Inc., 337 F.2d 706, 708 (4 Cir. 1964).

3

Order enforced.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer