Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

13266_1 (1969)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13266_1 Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 14, 1969
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 415 F.2d 1006 UNITED STATES ex rel. HUNTINGTON PIPING, INC., a corporation, Appellee, v. T. A. WARD, Jr., dba Ward Construction Company, and the Maryland Casualty Company, a corporation, Appellants. No. 13266. United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit. Argued Oct. 8, 1969. Decided Oct. 14, 1969. John F. Wood, Jr., Huntington, W. Va. (Jenkins, Schaub & Fenstermaker, Huntington, W. Va., on brief), for appellants. James W. St. Clair, Huntington, W. Va. (Marshall, Harshbarger & St. Clair, Huntin
More

415 F.2d 1006

UNITED STATES ex rel. HUNTINGTON PIPING, INC., a corporation, Appellee,
v.
T. A. WARD, Jr., dba Ward Construction Company, and the
Maryland Casualty Company, a corporation, Appellants.

No. 13266.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Argued Oct. 8, 1969.
Decided Oct. 14, 1969.

John F. Wood, Jr., Huntington, W. Va. (Jenkins, Schaub & Fenstermaker, Huntington, W. Va., on brief), for appellants.

James W. St. Clair, Huntington, W. Va. (Marshall, Harshbarger & St. Clair, Huntington, W. Va., on brief), for appellee.

Before SOBELOFF, BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

This is a Miller Act case in which the jury returned a verdict in the amount of $8,463.34 in favor of the subcontractor.

2

After examination of the record and briefs and after hearing argument, we find no substantial error, and the judgment is

3

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer