Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

National Labor Relations Board v. Queen City Coach Company, 13705_1 (1970)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13705_1 Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 09, 1970
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 420 F.2d 1383 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. QUEEN CITY COACH COMPANY, Respondent. No. 13705. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued March 4, 1970. Decided March 9, 1970. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Jesse I. Etelson, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petiti
More

420 F.2d 1383

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
QUEEN CITY COACH COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 13705.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued March 4, 1970.

Decided March 9, 1970.

On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.

Jesse I. Etelson, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner.

Ernest W. Machen, Jr., Charlotte, N. C. (Blakeney, Alexander & Machen, Charlotte, N. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before SOBELOFF, BRYAN and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Upon consideration of the Board's application for enforcement of its order and after hearing oral argument, the court is of the view that the order is well supported by the record as a whole.

2

The order is hereby enforced.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer