Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cummins Engine Company, Inc. v. General Motors Corporation and McCall Truck, Inc., 13718 (1970)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13718 Visitors: 4
Filed: May 21, 1970
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 424 F.2d 1368 165 U.S.P.Q. 618, 166 U.S.P.Q. 234 CUMMINS ENGINE COMPANY, Inc., Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and McCall-Boykin Truck, Inc., Appellees. No. 13718. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued April 9, 1970. Decided May 21, 1970. Richard Russell Wolfe, Chicago, Ill. (Berton Scott Sheppard, and Wolfe, Hubbard, Voit & Osann, Chicago, Ill., Norwood B. Orrick, and Venable, Baetjer & Howard, Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellant. Arthur Raisch, Detroit, Mich.
More

424 F.2d 1368

165 U.S.P.Q. 618, 166 U.S.P.Q. 234

CUMMINS ENGINE COMPANY, Inc., Appellant,
v.
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and McCall-Boykin Truck, Inc., Appellees.

No. 13718.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued April 9, 1970.
Decided May 21, 1970.

Richard Russell Wolfe, Chicago, Ill. (Berton Scott Sheppard, and Wolfe, Hubbard, Voit & Osann, Chicago, Ill., Norwood B. Orrick, and Venable, Baetjer & Howard, Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellant.

Arthur Raisch, Detroit, Mich. (Barnes, Kisselle, Raisch & Choate, Detroit, Mich., Alfred C. Aurich, Philadelphia, Pa., John W. Avirett, 2d, and Piper & Marbury, Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellees.

Before SOBELOFF, BRYAN and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The court, after careful consideration of the briefs, and oral arguments, affirms on the able and exhaustive opinion of the District Judge. 299 F. Supp. 59 (1969).

2

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer