Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jenkins Metal Shops, Inc. v. Pneumafil Corporation, 13886 (1970)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13886
Filed: Jun. 08, 1970
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 427 F.2d 144 166 U.S.P.Q. 454 JENKINS METAL SHOPS, INC., Appellees, v. PNEUMAFIL CORPORATION, Appellant. No. 13886. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued May 6, 1970. Decided June 8, 1970. Robert W. Fiddler, New York City (J. Carlton Fleming, Charlotte, N.C., on brief) for appellant. Clifton T. Hunt, Jr., Greensboro, N.C. (Hunt, Heard & Rhodes, Greensboro, N.C., on brief) for appellees. Before SOBELOFF, BOREMAN and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 Upon a copious record and
More

427 F.2d 144

166 U.S.P.Q. 454

JENKINS METAL SHOPS, INC., Appellees,
v.
PNEUMAFIL CORPORATION, Appellant.

No. 13886.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued May 6, 1970.
Decided June 8, 1970.

Robert W. Fiddler, New York City (J. Carlton Fleming, Charlotte, N.C., on brief) for appellant.

Clifton T. Hunt, Jr., Greensboro, N.C. (Hunt, Heard & Rhodes, Greensboro, N.C., on brief) for appellees.

Before SOBELOFF, BOREMAN and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Upon a copious record and after observing the accused machine in operation, the District Judge concluded that the device does not infringe appellant's patent. We have reviewed the record and are in accord with the Judge's findings and conclusions. For the reasons stated in the District Court's opinion, 303 F. Supp. 653 (W.D.N.C.1969), its judgment is

2

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer