Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Henry Scott, 13951_1 (1970)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13951_1 Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 09, 1970
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 424 F.2d 285 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Henry SCOTT, Appellant. No. 13951. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued March 4, 1970. Decided April 9, 1970. Coming B. Gibbs, Jr., Charleston, S. C. (Court-appointed counsel) [Gibson, Gibbs & Krawcheck, Charleston, S. C., on the brief], for appellant. Thomas P. Simpson, Asst. U. S. Atty. (Joseph O. Rogers, Jr., U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee. Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BOREMAN and WINTER, Circuit Judges. PE
More

424 F.2d 285

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Henry SCOTT, Appellant.

No. 13951.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued March 4, 1970.

Decided April 9, 1970.

Coming B. Gibbs, Jr., Charleston, S. C. (Court-appointed counsel) [Gibson, Gibbs & Krawcheck, Charleston, S. C., on the brief], for appellant.

Thomas P. Simpson, Asst. U. S. Atty. (Joseph O. Rogers, Jr., U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BOREMAN and WINTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

In this Selective Service case, after conviction of failure to report for physical examination and failure to report for induction, the defendant contends venue was in Southern District of New York, where the defendant then resided, rather than in the District of South Carolina, where he was registered and where he was instructed to report. While he could have obtained permission to report in New York and, had he refused to be inducted after reporting there, venue would have been in New York, this defendant did nothing. His default was in his failure to report in South Carolina, and the proceedings were required to be instituted in that District. Johnston v. United States, 351 U.S. 215, 76 S. Ct. 739, 100 L. Ed. 1097.

2

We have considered the other contentions on appeal and find them without merit.

3

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer