Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

National Labor Relations Board v. Collins & Aikman Corporation, 71-1834 (1972)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 71-1834 Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 14, 1972
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 453 F.2d 1376 79 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2656 , 67 Lab.Cas. P 12,423 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. COLLINS & AIKMAN CORPORATION, Respondent. No. 71-1834. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued Feb. 7, 1972. Decided Feb. 14, 1972. Corinna Metcalf, Atty., N. L. R. B. (Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, Jerome Weinstein, Atty., N. L. R. B., on brief), for petitioner. J. W. Alexander, Jr., Char
More

453 F.2d 1376

79 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2656, 67 Lab.Cas. P 12,423

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
COLLINS & AIKMAN CORPORATION, Respondent.

No. 71-1834.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Argued Feb. 7, 1972.
Decided Feb. 14, 1972.

Corinna Metcalf, Atty., N. L. R. B. (Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, Jerome Weinstein, Atty., N. L. R. B., on brief), for petitioner.

J. W. Alexander, Jr., Charlotte, N. C. (Blakeney, Alexander & Machen, Charlotte, N. C., on brief), for respondent.

Before BUTZNER, RUSSELL and FIELD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and oral argument, we hold that substantial evidence supports the Board's findings that the company violated Sec. 8(a) (1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act. 187 NLRB No. 84.

2

Enforcement granted.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer