Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bradley Scott Banks v. Michael C. Samberg, 86-6651 (1986)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 86-6651 Visitors: 1
Filed: Nov. 26, 1986
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 806 F.2d 257 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Bradley Scott BANKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael C. SAMBERG, Defendant-Appellee. No. 86-6651. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 26, 1986. Decided Nov. 26, 1986. Bradley Sco
More

806 F.2d 257
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Bradley Scott BANKS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Michael C. SAMBERG, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 86-6651.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 26, 1986.
Decided Nov. 26, 1986.

Bradley Scott Banks, appellant pro se.

Before PHILLIPS, SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Banks v. Samberg, (E.D.Va., June 3, 1986).

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer