Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lawrence J. Lyszaj v. Warden, North Carolina State Penitentiary Attorney General of North Carolina, 86-7126 (1986)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 86-7126 Visitors: 1
Filed: Nov. 10, 1986
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 804 F.2d 1250 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Lawrence J. LYSZAJ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WARDEN, NORTH CAROLINA STATE PENITENTIARY; Attorney General of North Carolina, Defendants-Appellees. No. 86-7126. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
More

804 F.2d 1250
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Lawrence J. LYSZAJ, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
WARDEN, NORTH CAROLINA STATE PENITENTIARY; Attorney General
of North Carolina, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 86-7126.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 31, 1986.
Decided Nov. 10, 1986.

Lawrence J. Lyszaj, appellant pro se.

Richard N. League, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.

E.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Franklin T. Dupree, Jr. District Judge. (C/A No. 85-1332-HC)

Before RUSSELL, WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that an appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Lyszaj v. Warden, C/A No. 85-1332-HC (E.D.N.C., Apr. 8, 1986).

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer