Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Charles Hawkins v. United States, 86-7138 (1986)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 86-7138 Visitors: 1
Filed: Oct. 07, 1986
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 803 F.2d 713 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Charles Hawkins, Plaintiff-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 86-7138. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted July 10, 1986. Decided Oct. 7, 1986. Before RUSSE
More

803 F.2d 713
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Charles Hawkins, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
United States of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 86-7138.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 10, 1986.
Decided Oct. 7, 1986.

Before RUSSELL, ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

(Charles Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se. N. George Metcalf and James Randolph Spencer, Office of the United States Attorney, for Appellee.)

PER CURIAM:

2

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Hawkins v. United States, Cr. No. 83-107-R; C/A No. 86-226-R (E.D. Va., Apr. 21, 1986).

3

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer