Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

87-3619 (1987)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 87-3619 Visitors: 27
Filed: Nov. 23, 1987
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 835 F.2d 874 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Robert W. JOHNSON, August T. Stern, Jr., Thomas C. Doyle, James Lee Porter, Earl D. Ryer, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Mitchell Paris, Robert L. Robey, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MAYOR AND CITY CO
More

835 F.2d 874
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert W. JOHNSON, August T. Stern, Jr., Thomas C. Doyle,
James Lee Porter, Earl D. Ryer, Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission, Mitchell Paris,
Robert L. Robey, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, a Municipal
Corporation, Hyman A. Pressman, as Chairman, Donald D.
Pomerleau, Calhoun Bond, Edward C. Heckrotte, Sr., Charles
Daugherty, Paul C. Wolman, Jr., Curt Heinfelden, as Members
of the Board of Trustees, Fire & Police Employees Retirement
System of the City of Baltimore, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 87-3619.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued Nov. 5, 1987.
Decided Nov. 23, 1987.

L. William Gawlik, Assistant Solicitor (Ambrose T. Hartman, Acting City Solicitor on brief) for appellant.

William H. Engelman (Harriet E. Cooperman, Kaplan, Heyman, Greenberg, Engelman & Belgrad, P.A. on brief) for appellees.

Before HARRISON L. WINTER, Chief Judge, MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

The Mayor and City Council of Baltimore sought a modification of the district court's decree, previously entered and fully litigated, on the ground that Pub.Law 99-592 enacted October 31, 1986 amended Sec. 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act so as to permit the City to require firefighters to retire at ages 55 and 60. The district court denied the motion to modify and the City appeals.

2

The district court's denial was based upon its ruling that the 1986 amendment by its terms was inapplicable to this case. We agree and we affirm on the opinion of the district court, Johnson v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Civ. No. H-79-998, D.Md. (August 5, 1987) (unpublished).

3

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer