Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Melvin Lee Smith v. Evelyn Hill Robert W. Miller G. E. Teachey Benjamin F. Clifton Douscha Rand Lola May McCormick Gordon Battle, 87-7092 (1987)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 87-7092 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 21, 1987
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 825 F.2d 408 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Melvin Lee SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Evelyn HILL; Robert W. Miller; G. E. Teachey; Benjamin F. Clifton; Douscha Rand; Lola May McCormick; Gordon Battle, Defendants-Appellees. No. 87-7092 United States
More

825 F.2d 408
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Melvin Lee SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Evelyn HILL; Robert W. Miller; G. E. Teachey; Benjamin F.
Clifton; Douscha Rand; Lola May McCormick; Gordon
Battle, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-7092

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 15, 1987.
Decided July 21, 1987.

Melvin Lee Smith, appellant pro se.

Jacob Leonard Safron, Special Deputy Attorney General, for appellees Hill and Battle.

Allan R. Gitter, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, for appellees Miller, Teachey, Rand and McCormick. Benjamin F. Clifton, Jr., appellee.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Hill, C/A No. 86-670-CRT (E.D.N.C., Feb. 23, 1987).

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer