Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

87-7100 (1987)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 87-7100 Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 19, 1987
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 828 F.2d 18 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Lewis A. WOODLIFE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arnold HOPKINS, Commissioner, D.O.C., Howard Lyles, Warden, Bernard Smith, Asst. Warden, H. E. Rodgers, Classification Super., Krispa Kashyap, M.D., Ph.D., Barbara
More

828 F.2d 18
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Lewis A. WOODLIFE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Arnold HOPKINS, Commissioner, D.O.C., Howard Lyles, Warden,
Bernard Smith, Asst. Warden, H. E. Rodgers, Classification
Super., Krispa Kashyap, M.D., Ph.D., Barbara Welsh, Prison
Chief Psychologist, Walter Lassiter, P.C. Class Counselor,
Raymond Keen, Class Counselor, Lucille Bagley, Class
Counselor, Clarence J. Guienze, Deputy Commissioner, D.O.C.,
Lawrence Carpenter, Chief of Security; Ivy Russell, Cpl.,
CO. II, Willie Ford, Cpl., CO II, Gary Carter, Sgt., CO II,
C. Jobes, Cpl., CO II, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-7100

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 30, 1987.
Decided August 19, 1987.

Lewis A. Woodliff, appellant pro se.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Woodliff v. Hopkins, C/A No. 86-1343 (D. Md., Dec. 9, 1986).

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer