Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

87-1008 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 87-1008 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 26, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 838 F.2d 466 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Robert W. HART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles MILLER, WV Department of Highways, Paul McMahan, WV Department of Highways, Elwood Penn, WV Department of Highways, Paul Parker, Jr., Kathleen Berry, WV Depar
More

838 F.2d 466
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert W. HART, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Charles MILLER, WV Department of Highways, Paul McMahan, WV
Department of Highways, Elwood Penn, WV Department of
Highways, Paul Parker, Jr., Kathleen Berry, WV Department of
Highways, Susan Tucker, Prosecuting Attorney, Monongalia
County, Clark Frame, Richard Neely, for Frank DePond, WV
State Supreme Court, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-1008.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 12, 1987.
Decided Jan. 26, 1988.

Robert W. Hart, appellant pro se.

Nancy Jean Aliff, West Virginia Department of Highways, for Appellees Miller, McMahan, Penn, and Berry, George Baker Armistead, Baker & Armistead, for appellee Neely.

Paul Parker, Jr., Susan Tucker, Clark Frame, Appellees.

S.D.W.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER, and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court.* Hart v. Miller, C/A No. 86-851-2 (S.D.W.Va. Dec. 10, 1986).

2

AFFIRMED.

*

The supplemental brief submitted with appellant's motion to allow a formal brief has been filed and considered in the disposition of this appeal

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer