Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Satish Bhaturia v. Exxon Corporation, 87-2215 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 87-2215 Visitors: 3
Filed: May 26, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 848 F.2d 184 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Satish BHATURIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EXXON CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 87-2215. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: April 15, 1988. Decided: May 26, 1988. Satish Bhaturia
More

848 F.2d 184
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Satish BHATURIA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
EXXON CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 87-2215.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 15, 1988.

Decided: May 26, 1988.

Satish Bhaturia, appellant pro se.

Sue C. Erwin (Sinkler & Boyd), William Boyd, James H. Lengel, for appellee.

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that this appeal from his order denying relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the magistrate. Bhaturia v. Exxon Corporation, C/A No. 85-3047 (D.S.C. Nov. 23, 1987).

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer