Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

87-6625 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 87-6625 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jun. 09, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 849 F.2d 605 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Raymond R. LATHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Norma GLUCKSTERN, Director, Patuxent Institution; Calvin Lightfoot, Acting Secretary, Public Safety & Correctional Services; Franicis L. Carney, Clinical Coordinat
More

849 F.2d 605
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Raymond R. LATHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Norma GLUCKSTERN, Director, Patuxent Institution; Calvin
Lightfoot, Acting Secretary, Public Safety & Correctional
Services; Franicis L. Carney, Clinical Coordinator; Devon
Brown, Unit II Chairperson; Dianna Deford, Social Worker;
Isaac J. Yohannas, Psychologist; Jay Casey, Psychologist;
Susan Strausburg, Social Worker; John J. Murry, Chairman
Evaulation Team; Fred S. Berlin, Psychiatrist, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-6625.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 14, 1988.
Decided: June 9, 1988.

Before K.K. HALL, JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

Raymond R. Latham, appellant pro se.

Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Appellant's motions for the production of documents and the appointment of counsel are denied. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Latham v. Gluckstern, C/A No. 0416-1 (D.Md. Aug. 5, 1987).

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer