Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Eldred Leon Hill v. Charles M. Creecy, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, 87-6698 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 87-6698 Visitors: 15
Filed: Sep. 20, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 859 F.2d 150 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Eldred Leon HILL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles M. CREECY, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. No. 87-6698. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted J
More

859 F.2d 150
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Eldred Leon HILL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Charles M. CREECY, Attorney General of the State of North
Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 87-6698.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 19, 1988.
Decided Sept. 20, 1988.

Eldred Leon Hill, appellant pro se.

Richard Norwood League, Office of Attorney General of North Carolina, for appellees.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Eldred Leon Hill seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hill v. Creecy, C/A No. 87-111-A-C (W.D.N.C. Nov. 4, 1987). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer