Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Maulick v. Hanover County, 87-7398 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 87-7398 Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 29, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 843 F.2d 1387 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. No. 87-7398. Richard Steven MAULICK, Plaintiff-Appellant v. HANOVER COUNTY, Maggie Frenier, Hanover Social Services, Marshall T. Bailey: Hanover Sheriff's Department, Stephen Maguigan, Assistant Prosecutor
More

843 F.2d 1387
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

No. 87-7398.

Richard Steven MAULICK, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
HANOVER COUNTY, Maggie Frenier, Hanover Social Services,
Marshall T. Bailey: Hanover Sheriff's Department, Stephen
Maguigan, Assistant Prosecutor, Wade Kiaser, Assistant
Prosecutor, Commonwealth Attorney's Office, Hanover, Lisa
Barker, County Attorney, Hanover, J. Maston Davis:
Commonwealth of Virginia: Edward R. Vaughn, Defendants-Appellees.

1

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 12, 1988.
Decided March 29, 1988.

2

(Richard Steven Maulick, appellant pro se.

3

Randolph Courtland DuVall, Pender & Coward, for appellees Hanover County, Maggie Frenier, and Hanover Social Services.

4

James Walter Hopper, Warren Hunter Britt, GArdner, Moss & Hopper, for appellees Marshall T. Bailey and Hanover Sheriff's Department.

5

John Adrian Gibney, Jr., Kathleen Shepherd Mehfoud, Lacy & Mehfoud, PC, for appellees Stephen Maguigan, Wade Kiaser, Commonwealth Attorney's Office, Hanover, Lisa Baker, and Edward R. Vaughn.

6

Guy Winston Horsely, Jr., Assistant aTtorney General, for appellees J. Maston Davis and Commonwealth of Virginia.

7

Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

8

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Maulick v. Hanover County, C/A No. 87-355-N (E.D.Va. Nov. 3, 1987).

9

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer