Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Jesse Lee Hines v. L.B. Cei, 87-7769 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 87-7769 Visitors: 24
Filed: Feb. 04, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 838 F.2d 1210 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Jesse Lee HINES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. L.B. CEI, Defendant-Appellee. No. 87-7769. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: Dec. 30, 1987. Decided: Feb. 4, 1988. Before K.K. HALL and WIL
More

838 F.2d 1210
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jesse Lee HINES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
L.B. CEI, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 87-7769.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 30, 1987.
Decided: Feb. 4, 1988.

Before K.K. HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Jesse Lee Hines, appellant pro se.

PER CURIAM:

1

Jesse Lee Hines appeals the district court's dismissal of this 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action for failure to pay the assessed filing fee. Finding that the district court properly complied with the procedures approved in Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action without prejudice, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer