Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Moses Shelton White v. Jimmy G. Bullock Attorney General of North Carolina, 87-7780 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 87-7780 Visitors: 16
Filed: Dec. 22, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 865 F.2d 1261 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Moses Shelton WHITE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jimmy G. BULLOCK; Attorney General of North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. No. 87-7780. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: Oct. 31, 1
More

865 F.2d 1261
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Moses Shelton WHITE, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Jimmy G. BULLOCK; Attorney General of North Carolina,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 87-7780.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 31, 1988.
Decided: Dec. 22, 1988.

Moses Shelton White, appellant pro se.

Richard Norwood League (Office of the Attorney General), for appellees.

Before DONALD RUSSELL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Moses Shelton White seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254.* Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. White v. Bullock, C/A No. 86-1267-HC (E.D.N.C. Oct. 22, 1987). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

*

Although we initially dismissed this case because the record did not contain a timely notice of appeal, we granted a rehearing when we were presented with a timely notice of appeal which had been returned to White by the district court

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer