Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Larry Billy Cooper v. David Chester Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, 88-6595 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-6595 Visitors: 27
Filed: Aug. 08, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 857 F.2d 1468 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Larry Billy COOPER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David CHESTER; Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. No. 88-6595. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: J
More

857 F.2d 1468
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Larry Billy COOPER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
David CHESTER; Attorney General of the State of North
Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 88-6595.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 2, 1988.
Decided: Aug. 8, 1988.

Larry Billy Cooper, appellant pro se.

Barry Steven McNeill, Assistant Attorney General (Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina), for appellees.

Before MURNAGHAN and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Larry Billy Cooper seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Cooper v. Chester, CA-87-564-C-D (M.D.N.C. Mar. 17, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer