Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Kerry Lee Smith v. Magisterial Court Administrator, Barbara Scott, Clerk of Court in the Fifth Judicial Circuit, 88-6612 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-6612 Visitors: 29
Filed: Sep. 19, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 859 F.2d 150 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Kerry Lee SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MAGISTERIAL COURT ADMINISTRATOR, Barbara Scott, Clerk of Court in the Fifth Judicial Circuit, Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-6612. United States Court of Appeals, Four
More

859 F.2d 150
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Kerry Lee SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MAGISTERIAL COURT ADMINISTRATOR, Barbara Scott, Clerk of
Court in the Fifth Judicial Circuit, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-6612.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 30, 1988.
Decided Sept. 19, 1988.

Kerry Lee Smith, appellant pro se.

Leslie Arlen Cotter, Jr., Richardson, Plowden, Grier & Howser, for appellees.

Before ERVIN, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Kerry Lee Smith appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Magisterial Court Administrator, CA-3:86-2957 (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 1988).

2

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

3

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer