Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Victor Huntley v. Warden Lyles, 88-7039 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-7039 Visitors: 6
Filed: May 12, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 846 F.2d 71 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Victor HUNTLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden LYLES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 88-7039. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted March 28, 1988. Decided May 12, 1988. Victor Huntley, appellan
More

846 F.2d 71
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Victor HUNTLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Warden LYLES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 88-7039.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 28, 1988.
Decided May 12, 1988.

Victor Huntley, appellant pro se.

Glenn William Bell, Office of Attorney General of Maryland, for appellee.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Huntley v. Lyles, C/A No. 87-2724-S (D.Md. Jan. 21, 1988).

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer