Filed: Oct. 03, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 861 F.2d 263 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Edward A. GANEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sam P. GARRISON, Director of Prisons, Secretary of Corrections, Director, Social Services of New Hanover County, Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-7555. United States Cou
Summary: 861 F.2d 263 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Edward A. GANEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sam P. GARRISON, Director of Prisons, Secretary of Corrections, Director, Social Services of New Hanover County, Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-7555. United States Cour..
More
861 F.2d 263
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Edward A. GANEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Sam P. GARRISON, Director of Prisons, Secretary of
Corrections, Director, Social Services of New
Hanover County, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 88-7555.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 29, 1988.
Decided Oct. 3, 1988.
Edward A. Ganey, appellant pro se.
Jacob Leonard Safron, Office of the Attorney General, Robert W. Pope, County Attorney, Wanda M. Copley, County Attorney's Office, for appellees.
Before WIDENER, CHAPMAN, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Ganey v. Garrison, C/A No. 87-90-CRT (E.D.N.C. Feb. 17, 1988).
