Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Anthony Dandridge v. Clarence L. Jackson B. Norris Vassar Virginia Parole Board Members, 88-7748 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-7748 Visitors: 1
Filed: Nov. 23, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 862 F.2d 869 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Anthony DANDRIDGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Clarence L. JACKSON; B. Norris Vassar; Virginia Parole Board Members, Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-7748. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted:
More

862 F.2d 869
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Anthony DANDRIDGE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Clarence L. JACKSON; B. Norris Vassar; Virginia Parole
Board Members, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-7748.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 21, 1988.
Decided: Nov. 23, 1988.

Anthony Dandridge, appellant pro se.

Before WIDENER and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Anthony Dandridge appeals the district court's dismissal of this 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action for failure to pay the assessed filing fee. Finding that the district court properly complied with the procedures approved in Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action without prejudice, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer