Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

John Langford, and Jeannette Langford v. M. Wayne Huggins, Sheriff, and County of Fairfax, John E. Granfield, Chief, William Whilden, Beth Iddings, 88-2889 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-2889 Visitors: 45
Filed: May 02, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 875 F.2d 315 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. JOHN LANGFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Jeannette Langford, Plaintiff, v. M. Wayne HUGGINS, Sheriff, Defendant-Appellee, and County of Fairfax, John E. Granfield, Chief, William Whilden, Beth Iddings, Defen
More

875 F.2d 315
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
JOHN LANGFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
Jeannette Langford, Plaintiff,
v.
M. Wayne HUGGINS, Sheriff, Defendant-Appellee,
and
County of Fairfax, John E. Granfield, Chief, William
Whilden, Beth Iddings, Defendants.

No. 88-2889.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 30, 1988.
Decided May 2, 1989.

John Langford, appellant pro se.

Carolyn Smith Motes, Motes, Fite & O'Brien, Peter Donald Andreoli, Jr., County Attorney's Office, for appellees.

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

John Langford appeals from the order of the district court granting defendants' motion for a directed verdict at the conclusion of Langford's case-in-chief at trial on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 complaint. Our review of the record discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning stated by the district court. Langford v. Huggins, C/A No. 88-8-A (E.D.Va., July 6, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer