Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Francis Greene, and Keiffer Realty Co., a West Virginia Corporation v. Columbia Sussex Corporation, a Corporation, James W. Thelen, Defendants, 88-3869 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-3869 Visitors: 20
Filed: Feb. 22, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 870 F.2d 654 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Francis GREENE, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Keiffer Realty Co., a West Virginia Corporation, Plaintiff, v. COLUMBIA SUSSEX CORPORATION, a Corporation, James W. Thelen, Defendants- Appellees. No. 88-3869. Unite
More

870 F.2d 654
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Francis GREENE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
and
Keiffer Realty Co., a West Virginia Corporation, Plaintiff,
v.
COLUMBIA SUSSEX CORPORATION, a Corporation, James W. Thelen,
Defendants- Appellees.

No. 88-3869.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 27, 1988.
Decided Feb. 22, 1989.

Francis Greene, appellant pro se.

James McCall Cagle for appellees.

Before WIDENER and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Francis Greene noted this appeal outside the 30-day appeal period established by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1), and failed to move for an extension of the appeal period within the additional 30-day period provided by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5). The time periods established by Fed.R.App.P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer