Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ralph Alexander v. State of Maryland Commissioner of Correction Warden, Maryland State Penitentiary Ernestine Williams, Office Supervisor II, 88-6617 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-6617 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 18, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 879 F.2d 862 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Ralph ALEXANDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF MARYLAND; Commissioner of Correction; Warden, Maryland State Penitentiary; Ernestine Williams, Office Supervisor II, Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-6617. Unit
More

879 F.2d 862
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ralph ALEXANDER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MARYLAND; Commissioner of Correction; Warden,
Maryland State Penitentiary; Ernestine Williams,
Office Supervisor II, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-6617.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 9, 1989.
Decided: July 18, 1989.

Ralph Alexander, appellant pro se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Karen U. Smith (Office of the Attorney General), for appellees.

Before K.K. HALL and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Ralph Alexander appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Alexander v. State of Maryland, C/A No. 87-3192-S (D.Md. April 5, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer