Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Paul Lowery v. David W. Chester, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, 88-6633 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-6633 Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 13, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 872 F.2d 418 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Paul LOWERY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. David W. CHESTER, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees No. 88-6633. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 26,
More

872 F.2d 418
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Paul LOWERY, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
David W. CHESTER, Attorney General of the State of North
Carolina, Respondents-Appellees

No. 88-6633.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 26, 1988.
Decided March 13, 1989.

Paul Lowery, appellant pro se.

Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER, and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Paul Lowery seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause* to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Lowery v. Chester, C/A No. 86-1278-HC (E.D.N.C. Apr. 18, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

*

Lowery also filed a motion for rehearing of the denial of a certificate of probable cause to appeal but our disposition today resolves all issues against Lowery

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer