Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Walter D. Boykin, Jr. v. Jim G. Bullock, North Carolina Attorney General, Lacy Thornburg, North Carolina Department of Justice, 88-6794 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-6794 Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 09, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 872 F.2d 416 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Walter D. BOYKIN, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jim G. BULLOCK, North Carolina Attorney General, Lacy Thornburg, North Carolina Department of Justice, Respondents-Appellees. No. 88-6794. United States Court
More

872 F.2d 416
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Walter D. BOYKIN, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Jim G. BULLOCK, North Carolina Attorney General, Lacy
Thornburg, North Carolina Department of Justice,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 88-6794.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 9, 1988.
Decided March 9, 1989.

Walter D. Boykin, Jr., appellant pro se.

Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Walter D. Boykin, Jr., appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Boykin v. Bullock, C/A No. 87-897-HC (E.D.N.C. July 27, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer