Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Walter Oliver Melvin v. Aaron Johnson, Secretary of Correction, Attorney General of North Carolina, 88-7239 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-7239 Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 24, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 872 F.2d 418 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Walter Oliver MELVIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Aaron JOHNSON, Secretary of Correction, Attorney General of North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees. 88-7239. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Mar
More

872 F.2d 418
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Walter Oliver MELVIN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Aaron JOHNSON, Secretary of Correction, Attorney General of
North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

88-7239.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

March 24, 1989.

Walter Oliver Melvin, appellant pro se.

Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.

Before DONALD RUSSELL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Walter Oliver Melvin seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Melvin v. Johnson, C/A No. 87-1074-HC (E.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer