Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

George Allen McDougald v. Hubert Stone Austin George A. Cox K. Stone J.L. Brown Mrs. Hayes Ruby Britt Olen Hester, 88-7244 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-7244
Filed: May 01, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 866 F.2d 1416 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. George Allen McDOUGALD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Hubert STONE; Austin George; A. Cox; K. Stone; J.L. Brown; Mrs. Hayes; Ruby Britt; Olen Hester, Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-7244. United States Court of App
More

866 F.2d 1416
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
George Allen McDOUGALD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Hubert STONE; Austin George; A. Cox; K. Stone; J.L.
Brown; Mrs. Hayes; Ruby Britt; Olen Hester,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-7244.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 30, 1988.
Decided: Jan. 31, 1989.
Rehearing Denied May 1, 1989.

George Allen McDougald, appellant pro se.

William McBlief (Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice); Joseph Carl Ward, Jr. (Ward, Strickland & Kinlaw), for appellees.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

George Allen McDougald appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McDougald v. Stone, C/A No. 86-1027-CRT (E.D.N.C. Aug. 9, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer