Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Robert J. Castleberry v. State of North Carolina, 88-7303 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-7303 Visitors: 40
Filed: Mar. 21, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 869 F.2d 593 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Robert J. CASTLEBERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 88-7303. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: Dec. 27, 1988. Decided: Feb. 21, 1989. Reh
More

869 F.2d 593
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert J. CASTLEBERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 88-7303.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 27, 1988.
Decided: Feb. 21, 1989.
Rehearing Denied March 21, 1989.

Robert J. Castleberry, appellant pro se.

Before JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Robert Castleberry, a 74-year old North Carolina inmate, appeals the district court's denial of his three motions for the appointment of counsel to assist him in completing a 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 petition. We have held that the denial of a motion for the appointment of counsel in a civil rights case is not an appealable order prior to entry of final judgment, see Miller v. Simmons, 814 F.2d 962, 967 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 56 U.S.L.W. 3267 (U.S. Oct. 13, 1987) (Nos. 86-6884, 86-7132), and we see no reason why the same rule should not apply here. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issue has recently been authoritatively decided.

2

DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer