Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jerry Sellers v. James A. Smith, Regional Administrator Ellis B. Wright, Warden, Graham, Assistant Warden, J.E. Clark, Assistant Warden, 88-7726 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-7726 Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 01, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 870 F.2d 655 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Jerry SELLERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James A. SMITH, Regional Administrator; Ellis B. Wright, Warden, Graham, Assistant Warden, J.E. Clark, Assistant Warden, Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-7726. United Stat
More

870 F.2d 655
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jerry SELLERS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James A. SMITH, Regional Administrator; Ellis B. Wright,
Warden, Graham, Assistant Warden, J.E. Clark,
Assistant Warden, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-7726.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 31, 1989.
Decided March 1, 1989.

Jerry Sellers, appellant pro se.

Richard Francis Gorman, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellees.

Before ERVIN, CHAPMAN, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Jerry Sellers appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sellers v. Smith, C/A No. 87-1217-AM (E.D.Va. June 28, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer