Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Troussant Delano Lett v. William Dolinger, Petersburg City Jail, 88-7845 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 88-7845 Visitors: 41
Filed: Mar. 06, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 870 F.2d 655 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Troussant Delano LETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William DOLINGER, Petersburg City Jail, Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-7845. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 30, 1989. Decided Mar
More

870 F.2d 655
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Troussant Delano LETT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William DOLINGER, Petersburg City Jail, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-7845.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 30, 1989.
Decided March 6, 1989.

Troussant Delano Lett, appellant pro se.

Dana B. Sykes, Hirschler, Fleischer, Weinberg, Cox & Allen), for appellees.

Before K.K. HALL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Troussant Delano Lett appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm* on the reasoning of the district court. Lett v. Dolinger, C/A No. 88-419-R (E.D.Va. Dec. 13, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

*

We deny Lett's motion for the appointment of counsel in light of our view of the issue presented. See Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160 (4th Cir.1984)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer